Introduced by
A Rogerian argument helps you find that middle ground. Based on the work of psychologist Carl Rogers, a Rogerian argument can be extremely persuasive and can help you, as a writer, understand your own biases and how you might work to solve problems by finding common ground with others 01/11/ · Simply put, a Rogerian argument is a negotiation technique in which common viewpoints and goals are identified. Opposing views and plans are also recognized using a logical approach. Common ground is reached to resolve those differences and reach an agreement. This strategy is used mainly in business Freebase ( / 0 votes) Rate this definition: Rogerian argument is a conflict solving technique based on finding common ground instead of polarizing debate. Baumlin describes the Rogerian Argument: "The Rogerian strategy, in which participants in a discussion collaborate to find areas of shared experience, thus allows speaker and audience to open
Rogerian argument – definition
Rogerian argument is a negotiating strategy where common goals are identified and opposing views are referred to as objectively as you possibly can in an attempt to establish common ground and achieve an understanding. It is also known as Rogerian rhetoric, Rogerian argumentation, Rogerian persuasion, and empathic listening Rogerian Argument. The Rogerian argument, inspired by the influential psychologist Carl Rogers, aims to find compromise or common ground about an issue. If, as stated in the beginning of the chapter, academic or rhetorical argument is not merely a two-sided debate that seeks a winner and a loser, the Rogerian argument model provides a structured way to move A Rogerian argument is also called the "common ground" argument because this method requires you to identify the ideas, beliefs and arguments you and your audience share in common. The assumption, therefore, is that you and your intended audience share common ideas, beliefs and arguments. Hence, the task is to identify these commonalities and use them
Share This Book
Rogerian argument is a negotiating strategy where common goals are identified and opposing views are referred to as objectively as you possibly can in an attempt to establish common ground and achieve an understanding. It is also known as Rogerian rhetoric, Rogerian argumentation, Rogerian persuasion, and empathic listening Freebase ( / 0 votes) Rate this definition: Rogerian argument is a conflict solving technique based on finding common ground instead of polarizing debate. Baumlin describes the Rogerian Argument: "The Rogerian strategy, in which participants in a discussion collaborate to find areas of shared experience, thus allows speaker and audience to open 01/11/ · Simply put, a Rogerian argument is a negotiation technique in which common viewpoints and goals are identified. Opposing views and plans are also recognized using a logical approach. Common ground is reached to resolve those differences and reach an agreement. This strategy is used mainly in business
Navigation menu
A Rogerian argument is also called the "common ground" argument because this method requires you to identify the ideas, beliefs and arguments you and your audience share in common. The assumption, therefore, is that you and your intended audience share common ideas, beliefs and arguments. Hence, the task is to identify these commonalities and use them In the introduction to a Rogerian argument, the writer presents the problem, typically pointing out how both writer and reader are affected by the problem. Rather than presenting an issue that divides reader and writer, or a thesis that demands agreement (and in effect can be seen as an attack on a reader who holds an opposing view), the Rogerian argument does not begin Rogerian argument is a negotiating strategy where common goals are identified and opposing views are referred to as objectively as you possibly can in an attempt to establish common ground and achieve an understanding. It is also known as Rogerian rhetoric, Rogerian argumentation, Rogerian persuasion, and empathic listening
In the introduction to a Rogerian argument, the writer presents the problem, typically pointing out how both writer and reader are affected by the problem. Rather than presenting an issue that divides reader and writer, or a thesis that demands agreement (and in effect can be seen as an attack on a reader who holds an opposing view), the Rogerian argument does not begin 01/11/ · Simply put, a Rogerian argument is a negotiation technique in which common viewpoints and goals are identified. Opposing views and plans are also recognized using a logical approach. Common ground is reached to resolve those differences and reach an agreement. This strategy is used mainly in business Rogerian argument is a negotiating strategy where common goals are identified and opposing views are referred to as objectively as you possibly can in an attempt to establish common ground and achieve an understanding. It is also known as Rogerian rhetoric, Rogerian argumentation, Rogerian persuasion, and empathic listening
No comments:
Post a Comment